The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006

The table below delineates information about manufactured mobile phone market contain share of world wide market in the given years 2005 and 2006.
Overall, it is explicitly that a shar shot up was accounted in the Nokia market share nearly one third in the year 2005 and 35% in the 2006.However, a tiny fraction was noticed in the BeQ mobile.
Now turning back to details, after that Motorola up lift his lead in 2005 and comprised to 17.7% whereas in 2006 it move up word respectively 21%. Moreover, in Samsung a growth was manifested in the year 2005 of 12.7% while in the year 2006 Samsung fail to hold the growth and fall to 11.8%.Furthermore there is a minimal growth seen in the Sony with 6.3% in the year 2005 and 7.4% in the year 2006.
Moving further, in LG both the given years approximately un change growth was accounted in the other 19.2% in the year 2005 and 16.2% manifested in the year 2006 moving towards total of all mobile companies in both given years is 100.0%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ed mobile phone market contain share of world wide market in the given years 2005 and 2006...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ed mobile phone market contain share of world wide market in the given years 2005 and 2006...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... given years 2005 and 2006. Overall, it is explicitly that a shar shot up was ac...
^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...rd in the year 2005 and 35% in the 2006.However, a tiny fraction was noticed in the BeQ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'moves'?
Suggestion: moves
...d comprised to 17.7% whereas in 2006 it move up word respectively 21%. Moreover, in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...il to hold the growth and fall to 11.8%.Furthermore there is a minimal growth seen in the S...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...il to hold the growth and fall to 11.8%.Furthermore there is a minimal growth seen in the S...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, third, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54494382022 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58178312226 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3062072401 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.8 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 5.23603664747 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385140307199 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227292412603 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18020656909 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268846192834 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178151592398 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.