The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given table illustrates the information about production in the globe market share of the notebook computer market. The year under consideration from 2006 and 2007.
Overall, it is crystal clear that in both year HP company notebook computer market was recorded maximum manufacturing in the worldwide market as compare to other businesses. While Fujitsu-Siemens was having the lowest production.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen from chart that in 2006, HP company was registered the highest percentage of producing of notebook computer in globe market that accounted about 31.4%. It was followed by the others and Dell, having proposition of 22.8% and 16.6%, reflectivity. However, under 12% was recorded in the case of Acer(11.6%), Toshiba(6.2%) and Lenovo(6.6) while, Fujitsu-Siemens was the lowest production.
Moving further, in 2007, in the worldwide market share of the notebook computer manufacturing of Dell and HP was sightly increased by 4%. Whereas, Toshiba just inclined by 1% in a year. Surprisingly, Fujitsu-Siemens and other manufacture were decreased by also same percentage of 2%. Lenovo show downfall of 3% while Acer have 1.1% of the total.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ook computer market was recorded maximum manufacturing in the worldwide market as...
^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... market as compare to other businesses. While Fujitsu-Siemens was having the lowest p...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omputer manufacturing of Dell and HP was sightly increased by 4%. Whereas, Toshib...
^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ll and HP was sightly increased by 4%. Whereas, Toshiba just inclined by 1% in a year....
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38043478261 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14827344887 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8136954092 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274646469475 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109754982518 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112348405821 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211240209271 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103515812996 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.