One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that weather to control raising crime in society should be responsible of the higher authority or individuals. In my opinion, this former apprehension sounds to me more rational as compare to latter, and I will discuss this view in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments that preventing crime is a duty of government. The most preponderant one is that they can allocate more funds to policing the streets. To elaborate it, when more money provided to policeman on the feet, they can make fear in criminals that they can not attempt any illegal activity in public areas. It can not only contributes to decrease crimes, but also leads numerous other benefits in various areas such as crime free society. Thanks to the wide range of advantage it offers, masses can enhance the productivity and quality of their lives much ease and efficiency. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive by forming stick punishment to criminals. This is because, government have power to alter society on a national scale through implementation of new laws and stricter punishment. for For instance, a study result published by the government of Australia in March 2013 and April 2016, clearly indicates that in most nation have low crime rate due to stick rule for criminals. Hence, it is clear that why it many are in favor of this viewpoint.
On the other hand, a section of society contradict above said view by providing some justification. The primary one is that individuals should ensure their belongings and house are secure on daily basis. To explain it, by making ensure that people are living in safe place, it is possible when individual use secure system at personal places and items. Therefore, some are not agreed with above said viewpoint.
To conclude, having pondered over above state it is crystal clear that government is responsible for crime in society is indeed too great to ignore.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 42
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 89
- Some people think that companies should provide employees with exercise time during the day 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'contribute'
Suggestion: contribute
...tivity in public areas. It can not only contributes to decrease crimes, but also leads nume...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...on of new laws and stricter punishment. for For instance, a study result published ...
^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...on of new laws and stricter punishment. for For instance, a study result published by t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79167779102 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0982450227 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19183957915 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498827401967 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512434330302 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104090197175 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467494150767 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.