The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007.
The table shows the worldwide market share of different brand notebooks for companies according 2006 and 2007.
If we look carefully, HP had the highest market share in 2006 and 2007 by %31.4 and %36 respectively whereas Fujitsu-Siemens had the lowest market share by %4.8 and %2.8.
To continue with, if we compare between Dell and Acer which had high market share according Toshiba, Lenovo and Fujitsu-Siemens, Dell’s market share increased by %3.6 from 2006 to 2007. While Acer’s market share decreased by %9. Likewise, %6.2 of market share in 2006 belong to Toshiba and it increased to %7.3 as climb by %1.1 in 2007 whereas Lenovo experienced reducing by %0.4 and it became %6.2 from 2006 to 2007. %22.8 of market share in 2006 consisted other company and also, their market share became %19.3 in 2007.
To sum up, HP, Dell, and Toshiba increased their market share from 2006 to 2007 while Acer, Lenovo, Fujitsı-Siemens and others decreased their market share.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Theagh | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | cnade95 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | raminghorbanii | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhullarb476@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 61
- The graph shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in twentieth century. 61
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, look, so, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71597222113 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512345679012 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.327380776 43.030603864 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461714589863 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.30282469642 0.103423049105 293% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115744273485 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346457847482 0.15604864568 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123259337561 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.