The table compares social and economic factors based on the United Nation (UN) statistics in four nations, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994.
The table compares social and economic factors based on the United Nation (UN) statistics in four nations, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994.
Overall, it is crystal clear that people in Canada and Japan accounted for a higher number in terms of income, life expectancy, daily calories supply, and adult literacy rate than public in Peru and Zaire.
Looking at the graph, it is noticeable that Japanese and Canadian people earned far higher than employees in Peru and Zaire and their average emolument was $15760 and $11100 per year respectively. Similarly, Japanese citizens had one year higher than their counterparts in Canada regarding the life expectancy at birth. Conversely, daily calories supply was higher in Canadian constituting 3326. Adult literacy rate, however, was similar in both countries with 99.
Regarding the Peru and Zaire population, the general public in Peru had a slightly higher amount in terms of annual income, life expectancy, daily calory supply, and adult literacy than people in Zaire.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 84 | view |
- It is true to say that most of the nations have been encountered social problems among their youngsters in the new millennium. 78
- The diagram demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to design a trade show over the course of two years. 56
- It is true to say that news editors are responsible for the content of TV news and written news. 61
- It is true that disabled people encounter various difficulties in their lives in all corner of the world. 78
- The pie charts demonstrate the proportion of time spent by adolescents and senior citizens on the world wide web. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ding the Peru and Zaire population, the general public in Peru had a slightly higher amount in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, look, regarding, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28048780488 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55093851925 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0528841572 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29864552789 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176813875984 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.337385305248 0.0843802449381 400% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299073406728 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.404943499424 0.0819641961636 494% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.