The table illustrates the figure of boys in two age groups participating in 5 distinct sports in the UK in year 2000.
The table illustrates the figure of boys in two age groups participating in 5 distinct sports in the UK in year 2000.
It is clear that boys who were between 6 and 11 years old are generally more likely to play sports than the other group. Additionally, football was the most common kind of sport for both age groups.
As we can see from the table, 87% of boys who aged 6-11 chose football to play, compared to 78% of boys in the 12-16 age group. At the same time, the percentages of in two groups taking part in basketball were 35% and 25% respectively.
Turning to the remaining sports, cricket was more popular than rugby and swimming. In terms of playing cricket, 6-11 year-old-boys accounted for 45%, while the figure for 12-16 year-old-boys was 34%. Meanwhile, the proportions of boys taking part in rugby in the 6-11 age group and boys who aged 12-16 years old were 23% and 21% respectively. By contrast, boys who enjoy swimming were the same in both age groups at 19%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-28 | IVANTRUONG | 61 | view |
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics. 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 74
- The bar chart compares the figures for 5 different phone brands in terms of sales around the world during a period 4 years. 73
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to studyscience subject. What are causes? And what will be effects on society? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54802259887 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61271184914 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54802259887 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1097151988 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453216924127 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223251884774 0.103423049105 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.280587982753 0.0843802449381 333% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.399135447116 0.15604864568 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.347212946236 0.0819641961636 424% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.