The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainme
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table shows data on the proportion household income five countries spend from Europe each month on food and drink, housing, clothing, and entertainment. Overall, the percentages of food and drink and housing are almost higher than clothing and entertainment in five europe countries.
The vast majority in proportion on food and drink is 36% in Turkey, while 37% of UK is the largest percentages on housing spending. A took the bottom positition on food and drink is 22% in Germany. In the same view, 10% is the lowest amount of money spanish pay for housing cost.
A smallest percentage of household income on clothing is 7% in France, while the per rate on entertainment is 10% in Turkey. Germany took the lead of clothing, household at 15%. It was followed by Turkey, UK and Spain. On entertainment, the lion's share in Germany is almost doubled than the minority in Turkey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | eurus0124 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | cheese.cheese | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainmeSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.W 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagram below shows how a hot air balloon ascends and descends 86
- People are living longer. Some people think that it causes big problems. Others, however, think the aging population has many advantages for business, government and society in general. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: The
...oney spanish pay for housing cost. A smallest percentage of household income...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90066225166 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84729706314 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0701107607 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2222222222 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233817081351 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900678838629 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107369244447 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164442161071 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120179838287 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.