The table shows the average length of video advertisements on the Internet and the average length of time viewers spend watching them.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the avarage length of online video adverts and the avarage viewing time for these videos.
Generally, it can be seen that most videos promoting consumer products and services have shorter timespan than the average time length for online video ad length. Only videos for public service, automotive and entertainment last for longer than the avarage 22.4 second mark (at 45.8, 27.2 and 27.8 seconds, respectively). Below that mark, while the average length for ads of clothing is the shortest (14.6 seconds), that for ads of other retail is the longest (21.0 seconds).
Another remarkable pattern observed is that most video advertisements could only hold the viewer’s attention for less their time length. In average, viewers also only spend 10.7 seconds to watch a video of average 22.4 second in time length. The only exception to this trend are the videos for automotive (14.7 seconds out of 27.2 seconds), financial services (16.3 seconds out of 20.5 seconds), travel (13.0 seconds out of 18.0 seconds) and home furnishings (10.0 seconds out of 17.3 seconds).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-10 | Nazli Ibadova | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | lili__nhnh | 88 | view |
| 2018-03-19 | n0air9x9 | 81 | view |
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 79
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university. 56
- Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 84
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rvices 16.3 seconds out of 20.5 seconds, travel 13.0 seconds out of 18.0 seconds ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17714285714 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48938317087 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3175272063 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201965978772 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128504345115 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898344809781 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146842067037 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00450302023868 0.0819641961636 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.