The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened, kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions.
The table illustrates data regarding underground railways from six large cities in various parts of the world, showing year opened, kilometres of route and yearly passenger numbers in millions.
Overall, London and Paris have the oldest underground train system in the world, compared to Los Angeles, which is relatively new. Passengers for Tokyo are the highest, in contrast to Kyoto, which has the lowest number of yearly passengers and the shortest route.
The London underground, which opened in 1863, is the oldest network. It is also the most extensive with 394 kilometres of route. The railway system in Paris, which was opened in 1900, is approximately half the size and serves more passengers. The underground in Tokyo is the busiest of the three with 1928 million passengers yearly and 155 kilometres of route.
Regarding the three other systems, Washington DC has the longest route of the three, in contrast, Kyoto has only 11 kilometres of route and the lowest passenger numbers of all the cities with 45 million passengers yearly. Following this, Los Angeles, which opened in 2001, has 28 kilometres of track and serves 50 million passengers per year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | Doan Cuong HUS | 67 | view |
- The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened, kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions. 67
- The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions 74
- The chart show the percentage of adult population with different categories in a city in 2003 and 2013 61
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17894736842 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67488576399 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521052631579 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.063325168 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417261163057 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161639363046 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140577325938 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271537344335 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153457970465 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.