The given table illustrates how many mobile phones were sold in millions from 2006 to 2012.
Overall, the figure for Samsung and Apple witnessed an upward trend. In contrast, the three mobile phone brands remaining experienced a downward trend.
As can be seen from the statistics, the number of Samsung’s cell phones marketed rosed gradually from 117 million to 396.5 million in six years beginning from 2006. While the starting point of Samsung’s sales volume was pretty high (117 million), Apple did not sell any phones in 2006. Moreover, the quantity of Apple’s cellular phones steadily increased from 2.3 million in 2008 to 135.8 million in 2012.
Turning to the three mobile telephones remaining, in the first year of the period (2006), Nokia was the most successful in sales volume (345 million). Besides, the figure for Motorola and Ericsson was 210 million and 74 million respectively. It is noticeable that the number of mobile phones sold by Motorola went down sharply from 210 million to 28 million for six years, while Nokia and Ericsson witnessed moderate declines. To be more specific, the quantity of Nokia’s cell phones went up significantly from 345 million in 2006 to 475 million in 2008, then fell by more than 100 million until 2021 (335 million). Additionally, that data for Ericsson rose remarkably between 74 million to 102 million from 2006 to 2007 after falling sharply to 28 million in the last year of the period.
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for the period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media TV newspapers Internet Do you agree with this view or do you think that in some circumstances government 92
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortage and what could be done to alleviate the problem 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03734439834 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55300382878 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539419087137 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.61035313 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218480540736 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103351189623 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439608021015 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139892227448 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467982365766 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03734439834 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55300382878 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539419087137 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.61035313 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218480540736 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103351189623 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439608021015 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139892227448 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467982365766 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.