The table shows the number of nuclear weapons owned by different nations in different years

Essay topics:

The table shows the number of nuclear weapons owned by different nations in different years.

The table illustrates the amount of weapons made from nuclear components that belonged to the following countries namely: China, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, UK, and USA for the years 1965, 1990, and 2005.

Overall, USA has the most number of weapons within the mentioned years. On the other hand, Germany and Japan had the least ownership from 1965, 1990 and 2005. It is also evident that most of the countries had a fluctuating trend of possession with the exception of the two countries, Germany and Japan, which had remained the same within the comparable years.

It is clearly evident that the nation of USA had the greatest amount of warheads for the years 1965, 1990, and 2005 which gives a number of 378, 7534, and 6976 respectively. In addition, for the years 1965 and 2005, the table demonstrated similar ranking. It is clearly visible that following USA, Russia came next. After Russia, we have UK in the 3rd place, followed by China on the fourth, France on the fifth, and Germany and Japan in the sixth place.

In 1990, it is noticeable that there was a slight change between the ordering of China which has taken the third place with the greatest amount of nuclear weapons possessed followed by UK. Also, it clearly shows that the countries Germany and Japan had not owned any weapons for war with nuclear components from the years covered and demonstrated.

Votes
Average: 3.9 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...s had a fluctuating trend of possession with the exception of the two countries, Germany and Japan, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e UK in the 3rd place, followed by China on the fourth, France on the fifth, and ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86440677966 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40567532554 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495762711864 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.336083775 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168495488012 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739719256614 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679308981662 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114472661377 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518401450588 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.