The table shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bycicles in 2011.
The table demonstrates how many people in different ages rode bicycle in 2011.
Overall, the proportion of female cyclists were much higher than the proportion of male cyclists in every age groups and people at the age from 18 to 59 showed preference in cycling less than the others.
As shown, the percentage of the population who rode bicycles by the age 0-9 were very high at over 50 percentage point in both genders. However, while female cyclists from 10 to 17 years old only showed a slight reduction in the figure, male proportion had dropped dramatically by over a half from 50.3 percentage point to just 24.6 percentage point.
The age group 18-39 had the percentage of cyclists in both genders significantly decreased. The figure of female group felt by over a half, from 42.2 percentage point to 17.1 percentage point and the figure of male group were even dropped much more dramatically, from 24.6 percentage point to only 9.7 percentage point. Furthermore, the proportion of population who cycled in both female and male hit their rock bottoms at the age from 40 to 59 when the former took up only 12.3 percentage point and the latter covered just 8 percentage point.
However, people who were over 60 seemed to showed their preference in cycling as the proportion of female group grew by approximately 6 percentage point and the proportion of male group had an increase by over 5 percentage point.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89256198347 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75140835462 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442148760331 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4705809624 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278608382366 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158516713477 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536029054718 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180309253612 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384953769817 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.