The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The table depicts the attendance of pupils in four secondary school types during 2000 and 2009 in the percentage. It is clearly seen from the given table is that the most popular secondary school type between 2000 and 2009 was Voluntary-controlled Schools and the least common type was Specialist Schools.
According to the statistics shown in the table, the top of the list belonged to Voluntary-controlled Schools in 2000 at 52% whereas the bottom of the position in 2000 was Community Schools and Specialist Schools, which was 30% lower than the first position. However, the highest number of attendances of pupil in Community Schools in 2009 was 58%, as opposed to the bottom of the list, which was Specialist School at 10%. In the other hand, Voluntary-controlled Schools still stood at the first rank with 38% in 2005. Looking at the figures in the table, there was an equality trend between Specialist Schools, Grammar Schools and Community Schools from 2000 to 2009, at 12%. When making clear comparison among four secondary school types, the period from 2000 to 2009 saw a dramatical increase in Community Schools while a gradual decrease was noticed in Voluntary-controlled Schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Rizvi007 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | rose_3012 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | MaKay1990 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | harshiniharshini | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | harshiniharshini | 61 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndances of pupil in Community Schools in 2009 was 58%, as opposed to the bottom o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, second, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21496337158 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497435897436 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5581700408 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266571407143 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164556865021 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103576641608 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271548902728 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893067171989 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.