The table shows the Proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the Proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
Overall, the number of students attending Voluntary schools and Community schools accounts for a higher proportion than the other two schools.
In 2000, Voluntary-controlled Schools enrollment was quite high at 52%. While the number of students in the remaining schools is quite low such as Grammar Schools at only about 24%, Specialist Schools and Community Schools account for only 12%. However, this number changed through 2005 and 2009 as Community Schools increased and other types of schools decreased. Specifically at 58%, Community Schools accounted for more than half of all students in Scotland in 2009, an increase of about 46% compared to 2000. This is in stark contrast to Voluntary-controlled schools. In 2005 and 2009 the enrollment ratio at this school dropped sharply, from 52% to 38% and 20% respectively. The rest of the schools have a relatively small percentage of students. Specialist Schools, for example, fell to 10% in 2009, a small change from 2000.
In short, Voluntary-controlled schools and Community Schools have much higher student populations. These numbers will change over the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y school types between 2000 and 2009. Overall, the number of students attendin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proportion than the other two schools. In 2000, Voluntary-controlled Schools en...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0% in 2009, a small change from 2000. In short, Voluntary-controlled schools a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while, for example, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4554973822 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21834125866 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6263611788 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218946799786 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103860145834 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13452103716 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210313076097 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18940003563 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.