The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary schools types between 2000 and 2009.

Essay topics:

The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary schools types between 2000 and 2009.

The table illustrates the percentage of students' enrollment at four secondary school types from 2000 to 2009. Overall, it can be seen that those studied in community schools went up significantly, while the proportions of students enrolling at three others types of schools gradually declined during that period of time.

In 2000, the proportion of pupils attended at community schools stood at 12% before it began to rise considerably for 46% during nine years. This contrasted to the percentage of three other school types that faced a decrease between 2000 and 2009. However, in the initial year students who enrolled at voluntary-controlled schools was the highest percentage, while others less than a third.

In the middle period, there was a slow drop in the proportion of those attended at specialist schools and grammar schools for about 1% and 5% respectively. This continued to decline until in the end of 2009, either the percentage of pupils enrollment at specialist and grammar schools were no more than 2%. Although the proportion of voluntary-controlled dropped there was a significant decrease from the initial year until 2009 for about more than a half.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-22 Fayna Faradiena 73 view
Essays by user Fayna Faradiena :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... schools gradually declined during that period of time. In 2000, the proportion of pupils...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24867724868 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14593759925 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0351356747 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347557370216 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170211005488 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106771010453 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245668232841 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534892390585 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.