The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table compares the leading mobile phone producers in terms of their share of the global market in 2005 and 2006.
Overall, it is clear that Nokia had the largest market share in both years. While the percentage of the market share of most companies fell between 2005 and 2006, that of Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericsson rose.
Nokia was the leader in the global mobile phone market in 2005 and 2006. Its market share increased from 32.5% to 35%. Its nearest competitor, Motorola saw a significant rise in sales from 17.7% to 21.1% in this period. Sony Ericsson also increased its sales by just over 1% from 2005 to reach 7.4% in 2006.
In contrast, the market share of Samsung decreased by almost 1% to 11.8% in 2006. L.G. sales also declined, from 6.7% in 2005 to 6.3% in 2006. The global market share of BenQ Mobile fell to just 2.4% in 2006, a decline of 2.5% from the previous year. Finally, there was a fall in the market share of other manufacturers by 3% to 16.2% in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-18 | Jasmineeee | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | duchoangg24 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | Minh Pham | 78 | view |
| 2017-12-02 | sherin rijo | 84 | view |
| 2017-07-02 | lauranguyen | 67 | view |
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 67
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47777777778 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.186377578 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3626187033 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.2727272727 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324276377924 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153641622611 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825739260097 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231837214737 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624273250972 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.