(The table) The table shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture illustrates the amount of milk which was produced each year in Netherlands, Australia, Tanzania, Guatemala in 3 different years 1990, 2000 and 2010.
What stands out from the table is that while the production of milk in Netherlands, Tanzania and Guatemala witnessed a progress, the opposite trend was true for Australia. In addition, the dairy industry’s output in Netherlands always ranked the first throughout the period surveyed.
Starting at 11.262.000 litres in 1990, Netherlands was the country which produced the highest amount of milk. Between 2000 and 2010, there was a significant surge in the production of milk in Netherlands from 11.155.000 litres to 11.466.000 litres. Lower a little bit was the output of milk in Australia with 11.246.000 litres in 1990. After a considerable plunge in the next 10 years, this figure continued to experience its downward trend to 9.165.000 in 2010.
Regarding to the two remaining countries, Tanzania produced 3 times higher than Guatemala with 87.000 litres in1990. However, both of the countries saw a substantial upsurge in producing milk to 1.55.000 litres and 84.000 litres after the time of 20 years respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 73
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3 different years 1990, 2000 and 2010. What stands out from the table is that w...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... first throughout the period surveyed. Starting at 11.262.000 litres in 1990, N...
^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...00 litres to 11.466.000 litres. Lower a little bit was the output of milk in Australia wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s downward trend to 9.165.000 in 2010. Regarding to the two remaining countries...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9668495464 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8347072514 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129789429621 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594657571878 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409212392612 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820789452592 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309323840258 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3 different years 1990, 2000 and 2010. What stands out from the table is that w...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... first throughout the period surveyed. Starting at 11.262.000 litres in 1990, N...
^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...00 litres to 11.466.000 litres. Lower a little bit was the output of milk in Australia wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s downward trend to 9.165.000 in 2010. Regarding to the two remaining countries...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9668495464 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8347072514 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129789429621 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594657571878 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409212392612 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820789452592 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309323840258 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.