The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables present the Fairtrade coffee and bananas revenues in two separate years 1999 and 2004 in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
It is clear that the coffee sales in all nations went up over the period while the bananas revenues rose in three out of the five countries. Overall, the UK had the highest levels in spending on both products.
In 1999, Switzerland’s Fairtrade coffee sales were the highest at 3 million of euros while the UK had the highest bananas revenue, at 15 million of euros. By 2004, the coffee turnover in the UK rose to more than three times that in Switzerland, 20 million of euros compared to 6. The year 2004 also saw the dramatic increase in bananas revenue in the UK by 32 million of euros.
The sales of both products in Denmark, Belgium and Sweden were far fewer than in other countries. Though the coffee sales in these countries grew from 1999 to 2004, the sales figure were not higher than 2 million of euros. Finally, the money spending on bananas in Denmark increased actually fell in Belgium and Sweden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-12 | suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun | 56 | view |
| 2017-03-25 | hai.entropy | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuun | 56 | view |
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 84
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 78
- Brick manufacturing 84
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72872340426 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5227966959 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494680851064 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0017636129 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266655576097 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115491483459 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740584319681 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179073192326 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373593002041 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.