The provided table give the information about tea and pineapples over the period from 2010 to 2015 in five European nations
In the first table, it is evident that level tea sales obviously increase. In 2010, France sales peaked at 2,5 millions, there was an significantly growth to 21 millions after 5 years. By contrast, the turnover figure for Germany and Norway slightly grow when it consits of 3 millions and 2 millions in 2015. In Austria, twice as many Fairtrade- labelled tea was bought in 2015 than 2010. Meanwhile, sales increased from 2 million to 2,7 million during the period between 2010 and 2015
The second table shows it is Austria which had by far the most Fairtrade pineapples than the other four countries with 48 million. Similarly Frane, the figure for Netherlands increased from 1,6 million to 5 million. Whereas, France sales increased by 4,5 million, there was an insubstantially drop from 2,8 million to 2 million in Norway. The lowest of Fairtrade pineapples was bought in Germany with 2 million in 2015
Comparing two tables, it is clear that the Fairteade tea sales ranged from 1,8 to 4 million in 2010 while, the figure pineapples sales in five countries clustered between 1,6 million and 3 million, except for Austria with the figure sales was 16 million. Between 2010 and 2015, both Fairtrade tea and pineapples sales definitely increased, except the figure pineapples sales for Germaany and Norway decreased
- The line graph shows the percentage of different age groups of cinema visitors in a particular country from 1978 to 2008 67
- The line graph below shows the population size birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because the computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive of negative development 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 67
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...sales peaked at 2,5 millions, there was an significantly growth to 21 millions aft...
^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...sales peaked at 2,5 millions, there was an significantly growth to 21 millions after 5 years. By contra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...e other four countries with 48 million. Similarly Frane, the figure for Netherlands incre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r Netherlands increased from 1,6 million to 5 million. Whereas, France sales incr...
^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('insubstantially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...les increased by 4,5 million, there was an insubstantially drop from 2,8 million to 2 million in Norway...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sales for Germaany and Norway decreased
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, similarly, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00829875519 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6510269206 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49377593361 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.7557111554 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.111111111 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340988201408 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170805940522 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142548335679 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276105530591 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142080486819 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.