The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given tables describe the millions of euro sale amount for Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in five counties in Europe in 1999 and 2004.
Overall, export volume of coffee increase in 2004 with regard to 1999 for all countries. Except Sweden and Denmark, other countries experienced a dramatic booming in sale of bananas.
Although in 1999 UK by 1.5 millions of euro was not the first country in sales of Fairtrade-coffee after five years it was managed to reach at 20 millions euro and with a stunning increase arrive at the top list. Switzerland was the first country in export coffee in 1999, and was able to experience two times booming, nevertheless, by 6 million euro selling of coffee, missed the first seat of list.
For bananas commerce, Switzerland was the first country by 15 and 47 millions of euros sales of Fairtrade-labelled of banana in 1999 and 2004 respectively. While Belgium by 0.6 million of euros selling had the minimum shares of trade of bananas in 1999, it was managed to acquire the second seat of list in 2004 by experiencing a 6.5times booming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...e of bananas. Although in 1999 UK by 1.5 millions of euro was not the first country in sales...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 67, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '47 million'.
Suggestion: 47 million
...zerland was the first country by 15 and 47 millions of euros sales of Fairtrade-labelled of ba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...004 by experiencing a 6.5times booming.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, nevertheless, second, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88648648649 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99107999433 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7067542722 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191866597421 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11567553921 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797953882832 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154471564317 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722898182484 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.