The tables show the amount of money spent on Fairtrade coffee and bananas in two separate years
in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
The tables below compare the productivity of selling coffee and bananas in millions of euros, in two years 1999 and 2004, in five difference EU nations.
Overall, it is clear that sales of two products in 2004 were higher than in 2004. The UK was the one that had the highest point of selling coffee and bananas.
There was a dramatic increase in the number of selling coffee, in the UK, from 1,5 in 1999 to reach a peak of 20 millions in 2004. Sales of this product rose double in 5 years from E3 millions in 1999, in Switzerland. There was a slight go up in the productivity of selling coffee, in Denmark Belgium and Sweden, from 1,8 1 0,8 in 1999 to around E2 million in 2004, respectively.
Sales of bananas climbed dramatically from 15 in 1999 to the highest point 47 millions in 2004, in the UK. The number of selling this product also rapidly increased, in Switzerland and Denmark, from 1 and 0,6 millions in 1999 to 5,5 and 4 millions in 2004, respectively. In contrast, there was a small drop in sales of bananas, in the two nations remain, around E2 in 1999 to E1 millions in 2004.
- Today, humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008. 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness? 56
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 56
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4236453202 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60070531409 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463054187192 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4687884317 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129406027326 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688876491186 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346901726274 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991428026372 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234632247136 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.