The tables show results of surveys about how people in a city felt about different aspect of their lives in 1980 and 2010.

Essay topics:

The tables show results of surveys about how people in a city felt about different aspect of their lives in 1980 and 2010.

The tables compared various aspects of citizens’ live, with three different levels of satisfaction between 1980 with 2010.
Living environment got the most good in 2010, with 82%, while it only 65% in 1980, therefore there is a remarkable change in the environment of living. Meanwhile, education received the highest recognition in 2010, however, the proportion of good of it emerged a slight drop to 72%, and living environment was in excess of it.
Otherwise, from 1980 on wards, the medical services and employment opportunities have a similar trend, showing a consider increase of good by 10%, which were both 63% in 1980. So, the bad attitude to them are decline notably .(8% and 10% respectively in 2010) By contrast, the decrease of the positive attitude toward shops and public transport were noticeable during the period. Particularly, the transport of public saw a dramatically decline to 38%.
Overall, there were considerable improvements to living environment, medical service and employment opportunities in this city, but the figures for other aspects of life saw a decline in 2010.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rtunities have a similar trend, showing a consider increase of good by 10%, which were bot...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bad attitude to them are decline notably .8% and 10% respectively in 2010 By cont...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...rticularly, the transport of public saw a dramatically decline to 38%. Overall, there were considerab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27840909091 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0734330063 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4364524524 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.714285714 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176922407619 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777692825712 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594874451085 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11214911239 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053104779163 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.