Task 1: The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012.
Given are two figures providing a comparison of school expenditure in 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012, as well as the rate of students who achieved higher learning diplomas and degrees in Singapore.
It is evident from the first chart that an enormous amount of expenditure is spent on boys over the period, while girls are at a much lower cost. From approximately 10 million dollars in 2000, the expenditure spent on boys saw a threefold increase of more than 30 million dollars in 2012, which made an upward trend in expense. In addition, girls also made a doubling in the fund, growing from nearly 5 million dollars to 20 million dollars. Furthermore, school spending on girls stabilized at 13 million dollars in 2004 and 2008 and reached a peak in 2012.
It is interesting to note from the pie chart that undergraduates achieving further learning diplomas accounted for the greatest percentage in both 2000 and 2012, respectively 0,73 and 0,68. Moreover, there is a noticeable decline in the proportion of students getting diplomas, whereas undergraduate obtaining degree saw a moderate growth, from 0,27 to 0,32.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | hongchau | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | hannahbui | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | Minty@1411 | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | nguyen duc | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | nguyen duc | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
- Task 1 The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05945945946 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88049788733 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2990839013 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.714285714 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300052316004 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129773298508 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850974014977 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217267626339 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783613915603 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.