The line graph illustrates the proportion of people who were born in Asia, the UK, and other regions inhabited in Australia between 1976 to 2011.
It is clear that the percentage of people born in Asia increased significantly throughout the period while this figure for the UK had a declining trend.
Starting at about 14% in 1976, the UK had the highest percentage of people living in Australia. However, this figure continuously declined to hit a low of around 5% in 2011. By contrast, the proportion of Asian people living in Australia was at the lowest point at around 3% in 1976. From 1976 to 2011, The native Asians settling down in Australia surged dramatically until reading the peak of 15% in the last year of the period. The other countries saw a considerable fall from 12% to around 7% in the first 10 years before significantly growing in the number of residents living in Australia from about 7% to around 14%.
Turning to the total, with around 23% of all the population, the total population in Australia ranked the highest in comparison with the others 3. The years between 1976 to 2001 saw a considerable decline in the proportion of residents from about 25% to around 20% before there was a significant rise in the percent of inhabitant to 25% in the last year.
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 72
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...native Asians settling down in Australia surged dramatically until reading the pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71111111111 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76109121388 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9722125705 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284859828234 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132164458348 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12885499074 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207453164437 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132017977262 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.