The table represents the rate of pupils that voted for 5 different aspects of university China in the 3 years 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, the number of students giving good feedback for the print resources aspect had the biggest percentage and this rate varied minimally during 10 years shown. By contrast, there was a slight decrease in the proportion of students rating well for the range of modules offered. Building and teaching facilities experienced a stability in the quantity of students rating in 3 years shown.
Referring to the three first aspects: print resources, electronic resources and technical quality. In the year 2000, the rate of students's votes for the facet of print resources was the highest, by 87%, whereas the figure for electronic resource accounted for the smallest percentage with only 45%. The period of the next 10 years witnessed a dramatic growth in the number of students who gave good reviews for electronic resources and surpassed the figure for that of technical quality aspect. It is clear in the table that the print resources subject was rated with the most percentage in all three years shown.
Turning to the next two aspects: building/teaching facilities and range of modules offered. During the 10 years shown the rate of building/teaching facilities was 75%, which stayed unchanged over the period shown. Nevertheless, the number of students voting for range of modules offered in a China's university decreased slightly by around 7% and ranked the lowest rate in 2010 at 26%.
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 89
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...ents giving good feedback for the print resources aspect had the biggest percentage and t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80860392366 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.37249892 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.363636364 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348299997154 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146893097317 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135932693278 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267388785958 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143368565905 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.