three major problems in London during 3 years.
The graph depicts the proportion of litter, air quality, and noise in London over a period of 3 years . Overall, all figure have variation styles of pattern and it is clear that the number of garbage was only line graph that showed a fluctuation.
As it illustrated, in the first year percentage of garbage was 70% and it was the highest percentage of polution in that year. The next year, a quatity of waste climbed moderately and reached three quarters, the greatest contamination during a time frame. Furthermore, there were gradual decreasement between the second year and the last year, accounting for bellow 70% at the end of period.
In contrast, the amount of din and air condition did not displayed an fluctuation. Both of them saw a slightly decline during the time frame. The quanlity of air started with 68% of pollution. This percentage continiously declined gradually from the second year onward and at the end the percentage was just under 64% . Similarly, the quantity of din displayed drop pattern, starting at 58%, plummeting and ending at 52%, the lowest percentage among other figure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph depicts the proportion of litter, air quality, a...
^^
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...noise in London over a period of 3 years . Overall, all figure have variation styl...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of garbage was only line graph that showed a fluctuation. As it illustrat...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of polution in that year. The next year, a quatity of waste climbed moderately an...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of waste climbed moderately and reached three quarters, the greatest contaminati...
^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'display'
Suggestion: display
...amount of din and air condition did not displayed an fluctuation. Both of them saw a slig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...din and air condition did not displayed an fluctuation. Both of them saw a slightl...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...played an fluctuation. Both of them saw a slightly decline during the time frame. The quanlity of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he end the percentage was just under 64% . Similarly, the quantity of din displaye...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, second, similarly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99459459459 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82186792794 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9212697203 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0601232290517 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270670788051 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436135844346 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398987097072 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127421969412 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.