The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The pie charts depict the percentage of the expenditure spending on five services by authorities in Someland in separate three years; 1980, 1990 and 2000. Overall, during the 3 decades, the percentage of the cost spending on K-12 education and health human and resources had fallen, while the figure for other services had increased. It is also clear that the authorities in Someland spent the greatest expenditure on higher education.
In 30 years, the greatest expenditure was on education which accounted for 35% of total spending in 1980 but rose dramatically to 45% in 1990 before falling to 40% of total spending in 2000. Likewise, although accounting for 16% of total spending in 1980, the spending on transportation fell considerably to 6% of total budget in 1990. However, this figure then rose sharply to 22% of total spending in 2000. On the other hand, environment services saw a rising trend, growing from 4% to 5% by 2000.
In contrast, K-12 education and Health and Human service saw a similar trend. By 2000, the expenditure spending on K-12 education had dropped gradually from 25% to 18% of total spending. Similarly, the figure had decreased slightly from 14% to 15% of total spending in terms of health and human resources, despite a reach of 20% of total spending in 1990.
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 81
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 58
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'likewise', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27734375 0.268076937826 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.08984375 0.116061578633 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0703125 0.0759168565197 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.03515625 0.0366838410393 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00390625 0.0131127313244 30% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.18359375 0.155750635184 118% => OK
Participles: 0.02734375 0.0379272487307 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80793901375 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.02734375 0.0210936926555 130% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0703125 0.0948980150116 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00390625 0.00967000014798 40% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1298.0 1161.00487805 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.9 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95412844037 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73763899035 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348623853211 0.337110787985 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270642201835 0.247514529752 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.233944954128 0.171178102325 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128440366972 0.112407865282 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80793901375 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.546246751206 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.4656754297 49.3433353143 90% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8 23.0094962315 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5524969166 42.9750493124 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8 135.714022679 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 23.0094962315 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 48.8642201835 47.7609492067 102% => OK
Elegance: 3.78787878788 2.94281807926 129% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452870519551 0.418131533498 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.210455761346 0.181151798455 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100829961941 0.0850326197045 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.653978997902 0.706616315825 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165476845128 0.157042692854 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242046876191 0.228904883108 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137953007112 0.108899403657 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.449918184291 0.367819155151 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0847574158577 0.0812612215331 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357188655195 0.316326947829 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946294870196 0.0921553760075 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.16585365854 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.02926829268 132% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.