The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The circular charts reveals what proportion of annual expenditures was altered through local authorities in Someland within two decades (from 1980 to 2000).
A quick glance at three pie charts is quite enough to make it clear that the majority of the entire spending was going for higher education in the period of twenty years. However, environmental services were almost ignored.
In 1980, over a third and one quarter of the local governments expenses were contributed into higher and K-12 education consecutively. Analogous pecentum (one fifths) was seen in both transportation and health and human resources.
In comparison, with 1980, after one decades, in 1990, higher and K-12 education were stood just above and exactly equal to twenty per cent. There was one tenth drop off in the transportation monetary participation. In contrary, health and human resources gained more attention with the smallest increment (6%).
In comparison, with 1990, after ten years, in 2000, higher education had witness of immobile slip back upto two fifths. At the same time, only 2% difference was examined in K-12 education. On the other hand, transportation had cross the one fifths. ealth and human resources were approached to the half of the previous years expenditures.
- The bar chart gives the top eight online activities in Slovakia in a given month 89
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below 77
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The flow chart below shows an automatic photo booth
- The diagram below shows the process by which electricity is generated in two types of hydroelectric power station 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'reveal'.
Suggestion: reveal
The circular charts reveals what proportion of annual expenditures ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one fifth', 'a fifth', or simply 'fifths'?
Suggestion: one fifth; a fifth; fifths
...ation consecutively. Analogous pecentum one fifths was seen in both transportation and he...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecutively. Analogous pecentum one fifths was seen in both transportation and heal...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtation and health and human resources. In comparison, with 1980, after one deca...
^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one decade', 'a decade', or simply 'decades'?
Suggestion: one decade; a decade; decades
...es. In comparison, with 1980, after one decades, in 1990, higher and K-12 education wer...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one fifth', 'a fifth', or simply 'fifths'?
Suggestion: one fifth; a fifth; fifths
...ther hand, transportation had cross the one fifths. ealth and human resources were approac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ealth
...ransportation had cross the one fifths. ealth and human resources were approached to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32338308458 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89927267346 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626865671642 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1665732435 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179026136341 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518290457307 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802232148351 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10675108685 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893392701249 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.