The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts compare the changes in yearly spending in 5 different categories in one school in the UK in three separate years.
Overall, the school spent the most on teachers' salaries in the given years. It is also noticeable that the expenditure on insurance increased steadily as opposed to employees' wages, which decreased. The annual spending on furniture and equipment and resources fluctuated throughout the period.
In 1981, the school spent 40% of its budget on teachers' salaries after which the figure rose to a half in 1991, before a slight drop to 45% in 2001. The spending on insurance went up significantly by four folds in 2001 at 8% from its original number. By contrast, the allocation of budget on other workers salaries dropped continuously from 28% in 1981 to 15% in 2001.
The expenditure on furniture and equipment declined by 10% to 5% in 1991 but there was a dramatic growth to almost a quarter in 2001. With regard to resources, the annual budget allocation started at 15% and went up to a fifth in 1991, then subsequently fell to 9% in 2001.
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016 64
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 73
- The bar below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005. 56
- Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only. Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children. What are its causes and what solutions can be offered? 73
- Some people think that not all criminals should be kept in prison. Some criminals should do unpaid work to help other people in the community. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82795698925 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78876310867 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0963099539 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306061208026 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109933324857 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882720654579 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178903453853 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947273211072 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.