The following pie charts compare about expenditure by a particular school annually in UK in three distinct years.
It is apparent that a much larger portion of amount used to pay the Teachers salary whereas insurance coverage experienced the lowest spending value over the period shown. Most salaries including Teachers and workers salary paid in 1991.
From 1981 to 1991, spending as Teachers payments increased by 10% in last ten years and reached at half of total expense in 1991. Although annual expense slightly rose on resource materials and others worker salaries section by 5% and 6% respectively. But significantly less amount of money spent to buy furniture and equipment which is 5% only as compared to 1981. There was almost same amount of money used as for insurance purpose over ten years.
From 1991 to 2001, salary for all school staffs and amount allotted for resources decreased in considerable portion over the period shown on chart. A dramatic rise observed in insurance part which was nearly three times more than 1991. While yearly spending on furniture and equipment raised by almost five times, jumped from 5% to 23%.
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 88
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 75
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at 82
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08994708995 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54989129851 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8142583339 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245410109216 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909568860899 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974375494894 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168112666701 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113814493579 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.