The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts above show the changes of total school spending in different categories: teachers’ and other workers’ salaries, school furniture and learning equipment and learning resources. The pie charts compare the data of a specific UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Coming first, the major spending part, teachers’ salaries accounted for the vast majority of 40% in the total spending in 1981. This sector showed an increase to 50% in 1991. Then it decreased slightly to 45% in the year of 2001. Additionally, the amount spent for teaching resources made up 15%in 1981. Although it was up to 20% in 1991, it also fell to only 5% after 10 years.
Following that, furniture and equipment part varied during the 3 periods of time. This sector represented 15% of the total school expenditure in 1981, but then it sharply declined to 5% in 1991. However, in 2001, it rose to 23% of the total amount.
The figures for insurance made up for the smallest portion in the year of 1981 and 1991, a mere 2% and 3% respectively. Subsequently, in 2001, it dramatically rose to 8%. Besides, the figures for the other workers’ salaries gradually reduced by 13% in those years.
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children them to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 89
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and mak 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular Ul school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the US since 1980 with projections until 2030.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90147783251 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88885912592 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5650911223 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5384615385 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222610902034 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078106344311 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797033619225 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138410066943 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956281108991 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.