The three pie charts above compare the yearly expenditure in various parts by a british school from 1981 to 2001.
It is clear that the human resource expenditure, namely teachers’ salaries, other workers’ salaries, and insurance, accounted for the biggest part of total expenditure and fluctuated around 70% in all three years. However, other workers’ wages continually declined in three different years while insurance gradually climbed.
In 1981, the spending on the workforce was 70% of the total and was constituted by nonteaching staff’s wages, teachers’ wages, and insurance at 28%, 40%, and 2% of the total, respectively, while educational hardware expenditure only accounted for 30% of total spending.
Although insurance slightly grew by only 1% to 3% of the total in 1991, manpower expenditure increased in the following decade by 5%. Consequently, spending on educational hardware decreased by 5%. In the mean time, the figure for resources, like books, was highest in 1991 at 20%, while expenses on furniture and equipment fell by 10% to just 5% of total spending.
By 2001, the total yearly spending saw a downside trend in human resource expenses (68%) and an opposite pattern in hardware expenses (32%). While spending on resources and nonteaching staff’s wages reached its lowest figure at 9% and 15% of the total, spending on furniture and equipment and insurance peaked at 23% and 8% of the total spending of the year 2001.
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 89
- In many countries women are allowed to take maternity leave from their jobs during the first month after the birth of their baby Does advantage outweigh disadvantages 78
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28755364807 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9259056622 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7070397922 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.888888889 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111689203464 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572495266755 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529441534578 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796960034891 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624539994243 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.