The charts illustrate shifts in the proportion of annual expenditure categorized by five different items in a UK school from 1981 to 2001.
It is apparent that while the figure for teachers' salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment had an upward trend, the opposite was true for other workers' salaries and resources e.g. books. Besides, despite some fluctuations, the outlay for teachers' salaries was dominant throughout this period.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, teachers' income accounted for 40% of total spending in 1981, 20 times larger than insurance, with a mere 2%. Afterward, the expenditure spent on teachers' salaries increased to 50% in 1991 but later declined to 45% after ten years. At the same time, insurance fees occupied 5%
According to the pie chart, in terms of furniture and equipment outlay, there was an enormous fall from 15% to 5% in 1991, then soared sharply to 23% in 2001. In contrast, the data on resources e.g. books and other workers' salaries were 15% and 28% respectively in 1981. Then, the expenditure on books decreased significantly to 9% in 2001 and like books spending, other workers' salaries stood at 15% in 2001.
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Newzealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 56
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries 73
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 84
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Newzealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, e.g., if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0518134715 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77284864882 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632124352332 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.113551193 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118419504239 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548635177863 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581872801171 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835343075197 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702635165548 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.