The given pie graphs illustrate the fluctuation of each year in a specific UK education in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, the proportion of teacher incomes was higher than the others. In contrast, the figure for insurance was the least throughout all three years.
To begin with, looking at the pie graph in 1991, obviously, the quantity of teacher's salaries stood at 50%, half as much as the total amount spent on education, which was the highest of those of the years 1981 and 2001. To be more detailed, the proportions of the teachers' incomes occupied 40% and 45% respectively. The opposite was true for the percentage of insurance, which formed slightly only 3% in 1991. Furthermore, the insurance rate in 1981 was just 2%, the least percentage of all. In comparison, the figure for insurance climbed significantly to 8% in 2001.
Turning to the other set of data, the proportion of facilities including furniture and equipment was 23%, which was higher than in previous years.However, the proportion of materials went down gradually to 9% whilst reaching a peak at 15% in 1981. Besides that, the share of incomes to other employees fell progressively to 8% in 2001, was the lowest rate in comparison with 22% of the year 1991 and 28% of the year 1981.
- Cases of bullying in school are increasing and worsening What do you think are the causes of this How can we tackle this issue 61
- Drug abuse is an increasing problem in modern times Discuss some reasons behind this and suggest ways it can be hindered 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Tourists damage many historical places making them harder to preserve What are some of the reasons for this Suggest some ways to resolve this problem 56
- Some colleges encourage students to create businesses while they are still in school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the proportions of the teachers incomes occupied 40% and 45% respectively. The o...
^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...which was higher than in previous years.However, the proportion of materials went down ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, look, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84259259259 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82992714647 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2866217049 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123155988219 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553788981519 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499849605476 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896398418013 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523304967105 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.