The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The three pie charts gives information about the differences in the yearly expenses of a school in United kingdom in three
different years.

Overall, In all the years major spending was on giving salary for teachers of the school . whereas, expenses for insurance of
the school fall into the lowest proportion.

Teachers salaries accounts for major portion in the year 1981.It was at 40 % and increased by 10% in 1991 to reach 50% and
go down to 45 % by 2001. At the same time salary given to other workers in the school falls into 28 % in 1981 and 22% and
15% respectively in 1991 and 2001. Money spend for resources like books was higher in the year 1981 (15%) and 1991(20%)
compared to 2001 (9%).

Similiarly, furniture and equipment expenditures amounts to 15% in 1981 and 5 % in 1991. But it was at its highest in 2001 at
23 %. Eventhough, the least spending was on insurance for school, in 2001 it was at its highest value of 8 % and was in
negligible prportions in 1981 and 1991.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...giving salary for teachers of the school . whereas, expenses for insurance of the...
^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...ing salary for teachers of the school . whereas, expenses for insurance of the school ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...unts for major portion in the year 1981.It was at 40 % and increased by 10% in 199...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63276836158 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58098964768 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54802259887 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1824170451 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 3.83414634146 261% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185656352447 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865016022922 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396310654291 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903745094525 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419917952832 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.