The respective three pie-charts represents the fluctuations in annual spending pattern by a particular UK school during the period of three years by 1981,1991and 2001. I will explain the comparison of given data in the upcoming paragraphs.
Firstly, from the 1981 to 2001, the annual spending was increased from 2% to 8% in insurance. The annual expenditure on teacher's salaries was 40% in 1981, that , went upto 50% in 1991,while, that was decreased by 5% in 2001. Furniture and equipment had 15% share of total spending in 1981.
Secondly, the other worker's salaries had a 28% share that fell down to 15% ,during, the period of three years. Beside it , In 1981, the 15% part of total spending done on resource e.g books, that, rose to 20% in 1991 ,while, fell down to 9% in 2001. As, furniture and equipment had 5% share in 1991, which, increased to 23% in the year 2001.
In conclusion, it seems to me that during the whole years period, the more expenditure was on teacher's salaries and other worker's salaries, while, insurance had low share in whole spending over other areas of expenditure.
- Today, most people get married and give birth in their thirties rather than when they are younger. Is this a positive or negative development? 46
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 56
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six-month period in 2011 56
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years.What are the reasons for this?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening course at an adult education centre in year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... teachers salaries was 40% in 1981, that , went upto 50% in 1991,while, that was d...
^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es had a 28% share that fell down to 15% ,during, the period of three years. Besid...
^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng, the period of three years. Beside it , In 1981, the 15% part of total spending...
^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rce e.g books, that, rose to 20% in 1991 ,while, fell down to 9% in 2001. As, fu...
^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...books, that, rose to 20% in 1991 ,while, fell down to 9% in 2001. As, furniture ...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...91 ,while, fell down to 9% in 2001. As, furniture and equipment had 5% share in ...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d equipment had 5% share in 1991, which, increased to 23% in the year 2001. In...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84126984127 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71686889765 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0919772465 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226987697487 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103099725151 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900050551404 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150422057185 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10475315894 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.