The pie charts demonstrate the information about how distinct categories of energy were produced especially by France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, it is palpable that petro energy was abbreviated, compared with the initial year, while other sources of energy were slightly increased during the second year.
Discerning the pie charts, the proportion of of coal was become the maximum (28.90%) in 1995 and after 10 years, its percentile was rosen and become 30.93% but nuclear energy was significantly elevated by 3.70% during 2005 that was consecutively 6.40% in 1995.
Analysing further, in 1995, the production of gas and petro sources was approximately more than the quarter percentage (29%), whereas petro energy was declined to 19.55% but gas energy was automatically inclined by 0.68% particularly in 2005.Followed by, other source of energy which was 4.90% and 9.10% respectively from 1995 to 2005.
- Scientists contribute more to society so science students should get more support To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 81
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 67
- Tourism is encouraged in many countries. Does tourism brings more advantages or disadvantages. 11
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and repairing the main features and make comparisons 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...scerning the pie charts, the proportion of of coal was become the maximum 28.90% in 1...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Followed
... inclined by 0.68% particularly in 2005.Followed by, other source of energy which was 4....
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....10% respectively from 1995 to 2005.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46478873239 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88890372446 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633802816901 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.6095999217 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.0 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144562336306 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101019561529 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497180521374 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101019561529 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497180521374 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.2329268293 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.