The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by Nomuka on Tue, 10/02/2018 - 10:46

The pie charts illustrate on which UK schools spend their budget by percentage in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

In the first year, resources and equipment were consisted same percentage and other workers’ salaries were the second highest factor. Ten years later, furniture and equipment sharply decreased by 10%, while money used in resources raise by 5% and wages of other workers were still in the second place. Regarding the last chart, teachers’ salaries were spent almost half of the funding. Amount of other staffs’ salaries and resources cost were accounted for 15% and 9% relatively and furniture and equipment were increased extremely by 18% compared the 1991.

Overall, it is apparent from provided figure that the most of funding was used to give salaries of teachers accounted for above 40%, whereas the lowest spent part was insurance which composed of below 10% during this period. Other workers’ salaries generally declined and cost of furniture fluctuated.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts illustrate on which UK sc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y percentage in 1981, 1991 and 2001. In the first year, resources and equipme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were spent almost half of the funding. Amount of other staffs' salaries an...
^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were increased extremely by 18% compared the 1991. Overall, it is a...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xtremely by 18% compared the 1991. Overall, it is apparent from provided fi...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, so, still, whereas, while, in the second place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4064516129 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73198193372 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632258064516 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9689614314 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818669875329 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534701021828 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101617514383 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111698500546 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133615772615 0.0819641961636 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.