The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.
According to the two figures, the graph represents the percentages of committed offenders in the UK by different age groups and sexes, and the pie chart displays a comparison regarding the proportions of convicted criminals in different sexes.
It is obvious that the number of male malefactors were always higher than that of female in all the age groups. Especially in adolescence, the amount of criminality hits the high points in both men and women while male criminals were triple of female ones. There was a significant discrepancy showed in two genders in jail as in the pie chart.
The conviction rates of both genders illustrated a similar trend among all the age groups. At the age of 10, the outlaws were 0% and 2% respectively. From then on, the conviction rate of youth boys soared to 16% at the age of 20, which is the highest percentage throughout the age range. In the meantime, a steady increase was showed on the conviction rate in youth girls, reaching 5% at the age of 20. Afterwards, the volume of criminality started turning down in both male and female, gradually declining to 2% and 0%.
Given all the age groups, the percentage of male prisoners was remarkably larger than that of female ones. Therefore, it shows a proportion that men outnumbered women with a ratio of 24 to 1.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-20 | Hyacinthos | 84 | view |
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 75
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 11
- Given are two pie charts displaying the categories of the annual spending divided by families in Canada between 1972 and 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79295154185 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84907275241 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533039647577 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1521021073 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9090909091 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358739340956 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123197302167 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044101823018 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205722620952 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324915853122 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.