the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

The two maps illustrate before and after the same island which affected by a tourist attraction.
Overall, comparing two maps, it is clearly seen that there are significant changes after development including transportation and some resident areas.

If we look first map(before), we can see only an island with its beach in the west and a few tropical trees. The island is not very long approximately 220 meters.

Seeing the second map, one of the mainly change is building of restaurant and reception on the centre of the island. Moreover, they have vehicle track used by tourists who can use these roads lead to from restaurant to pier. Thus, tourist can use their car for arrive the pier. There are 2 groups of accommodation on the island. One is in the right of the restaurant and reception, whereas the other one is in the west near the beach. Thanks to the footpath connecting between the west accommodation and the beach, people can go beach by foot easily.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e look first mapbefore, we can see only a island with its beach in the west and a...
^
Line 6, column 181, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...icle track used by tourists who can use this roads lead to from restaurant to pier. ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, so, thus, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79640718563 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71655733352 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634730538922 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3458131175 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208704038625 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860556706865 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098271411785 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155916315926 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118267064696 0.0819641961636 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.