The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The two pictures demonstrate a major transformation an Island has undergone with the addition of certain tourist infrastructures.

Overall, trees with which the Island was interspersed have been kept intact. While swimming has been opened to tourists in the sea, footpaths and vehicle tracks have been laid. Footpaths have been limited to accomodation whereas vehicle tracks encircles the reception and offers an access to restaurant.

In the centre are accomodations encircling the entire area, all of which can be accessed via footpaths. While there are accomodations on the Western end of the Island, there are nothing except a few trees on the Northern end. Moreover, reception and restaurants are all close to accomodation so that tourists can have an easy access in case there is any problem.

Despite the development, Island has managed to keep all the trees that were there right before Island went through a change. Yachts have started sailing which indicates that the island is receiving a good number of tourists. Also, a pier has been built to provide a harbor for tourists to land on the Island.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...acks encircles the reception and offers an access to restaurant. In the centre are acc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
... accomodation so that tourists can have an easy access in case there is any problem. Despit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17679558011 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88623141778 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.4535343832 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118189966291 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051456698591 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372246627208 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837681649375 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399170372165 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.