The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 to 2010. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The maps illustrate some proposed changes to the main road of the city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Over the period, the two roundabouts were construction on the main road to the city hospital. Various other developments with regard to the bus station and car park.
Looking at the maps in more detail, we can see that the first roundabout appeared to the south of the city hospital and it intersected with two roads is the ring road and the hospital road. The other roundabout erected near to the first roundabout and intersected with the hospital road and city road.
In the year 2010, the car park was divide into a public car park and a staff car park. The public car park located on the east of the city hospital. Next to the hospital road and situated at the left corner on the southeast of the city hospital is the staff car park. Finally, some bus stop on the hospital road innovated by a bus station located at the right corner of the city hospital.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-24 | thaotanya | 11 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-08 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 20
- The following bar charts compares the average age distribution of the population of Scottish in the years 1991 and 2001 Summarize the given information b reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 100
- the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city 67
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, so, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46022727273 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38489538165 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420454545455 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1929426146 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2222222222 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23614206335 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123884740634 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937721796448 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183675253072 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084923981248 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.