The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the number of barrels of oil production and consumption in China from the years 1982 to 2006.
Overall, the number of barrels of oil production increased slightly, whilst the number of barrels of oil consumption was a sharp increase over the twenty-four years.
In 1982, the amount of oil production and consumption was the same nearly at about 2 million barrels per day, then it changed clearly. The number of barrels of oil production rose suddenly at 3 million barrels per day in 1986, whereas the number of barrels of oil consumption remained stable from the years 1986 to 1990.
During sixteen years from 1990 to 2006, the number of barrels of oil consumption went up dramatically from 2 million to over 3 million barrels per day in 1994, then reach a peak at over 6 million barrels per day in 2006. In contrast, the figures for production just climbed roughly over 3 million barrels per day in 2006. That means, people in China consumed at a higher rate than it is production.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 to 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- The following bar charts compares the average age distribution of the population of Scottish in the years 1991 and 2001 Summarize the given information b reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 937.175257732 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 206.0 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71751412429 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63075503145 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 127.690721649 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446327683616 0.622605031667 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 290.88556701 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7053289797 44.8134815571 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 76.5299724578 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 16.8248392259 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 4.34317383033 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152652962024 0.216113520407 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105218485726 0.0766984524023 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727819162134 0.0603063233224 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141332940961 0.12726935374 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773908705447 0.0580467560999 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 8.37731958763 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 70.7449484536 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 8.71597938144 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 7.59969072165 92% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 41.2886597938 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 8.62886597938 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.