The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The maps manifest the situation of paths around a city hospital both in year of 2007 and in year of 2010. As it is apparent from the pictures, dramatic alterations have been made in the road system about the hospital.
First, two roundabouts have been built, one at the cross of City Road and Hospital Road, and another at the junction of Hospital Road and the main building of the hospital.
Next, at the left side of these squares, a vast bus station has been added that substitutes 6 previous bus stops at both sides of Hospital Road. The Bus Station has been connected to the roundabout through newly-built roads.
Finally, at the right side of Hospital Road where was previously considered as a joint parking lot for both employee and people in 2007, now an exclusive space has been allocated to staff car parking. In order for public, another site at the right side of the main building of the hospital has been considered. In addition, a door has been designed in the right wall of the main building to facilitate public entrance.
- Describing the ways in which elephants fascinate humans - TPO51 76
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smartphone video games for fun and entertainment playing more simple toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s development 73
- Governments should appoint one national curriculum which includes all the students. 75
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of arts. 83
- TPO 54 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72282608696 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52501076192 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532608695652 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7423419385 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2239045449 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993038686354 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100541111112 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157188621122 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916631619594 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.