The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps give some information about an island before and after its construction. It is obvious that the island has changed a lot after being recreated and adding lots of facilities for tourists.
As can be seen before the construction there was no way to pass to the island. There were 16 accommodations for tourists who traveled to this island and wanted to stay there. In addition, a reception is located in the center of the island, and above it is a restaurant for passengers. In the south of the island and the middle are two sailboats for emergency conditions and come and passengers to the island. On the western of the island, there is a beach that in the new map utilizes for swimming. Although there is a footpath to the beach from the accommodation, a vehicle track is used for the reception and restaurant.
As a result, the two maps are shown on a 100-meter scale, and all facilities are illustrated in the new map. There were very good facilities on the new map after construction.
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 61
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58888888889 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88309247549 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.3600108932 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.6 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263552768257 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110098311698 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850906796008 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192439493848 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633148599305 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.