The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010

These two maps given below illustrate the way to a hospital in an urban area in two different time points: 2007 and 2010.

According to both maps, while the positions of the hospital and three main streets were kept the same, there were several changes occurred to some features. In 2007, there were 6 bus stops along two sides of Hospital road. However, in 2010, they were all removed. The car park in between City road and Ring road was turned from for both staff and public uses into staff only. Instead, a whole new car park for public was built on the east side of Ring road, opposite to the hospital. Two new roundabouts were added into two ends of Hospital road. Also, a new bus station was built on the right side of that street.

In conclusion, there are some information that people can learn from these two maps of an urban hospital in 2007 and 2010. The hospital was kept in the same position, while some changes were made to the car parks, bus station, bus stops and roundabouts.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
...to some features. In 2007, there were 6 bus stops along two sides of Hospital road....
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48901098901 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16230258509 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527472527473 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2886667359 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3296045648 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141406274521 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117989990662 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251631321051 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704153002751 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.