The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
The two layout illustrate the information about road which linked with a city health centre during 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it is Vivid that there were lots of transformation can be noticed in the access of road to a city hospital with the passage of time.
It can be clearly seen from the information that between 2007, a city hospital was situated in the Northern part and it had been remained untouched in the next three years. Moreover, car park for staff and public was found in the East direction attached with hospital road in 2007, however, in 2010, the staff car park was unchanged on there place but increased in size, whilst the car park for public had been constructed near the city hospital in the North-East .
The maps further depict that bus stop was placed in Eastern part of the city during 2007. After that in 2010, it had been established in the opposite direction (west) as well as attached with two ring junctions and which one of them faced with city hospital and another one was city road. Lastly,there were not any roundabout observed between 2007, while it had been constructed in South-East direction in the last year.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-02-20 | pateldhruv1708 | 79 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 464, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...near the city hospital in the North-East . The maps further depict that bus s...
^^
Line 13, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...al and another one was city road. Lastly,there were not any roundabout observed betwee...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, lastly, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76119402985 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4796643761 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4362532051 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.714285714 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332826301225 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161644054866 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065728357512 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219347435655 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341417834206 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.