The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps illustrated displays the road access to access to a city hospital at two different times, in 2007 and in 2010. Radical structural changes made over the three years can be noticed when comparing the two maps side by side.

In 2007, the city hospital had a ring road surrounding it and hospital road connected it to the city road which was in the south of the hospital. The hospital road had bus stops on both sides, along with a car park in the east of it. It was accessible from the ring road and was open for use by the staff as well as the public. In 2010, the bus stops were replaced by a bus station on the west of the hospital road which was connected with the ring road, the city road and the hospital road with two roundabouts. The earlier car park was made solely dedicated to the staff and a new public car park was constructed on the east of the city hospital, connected to the ring road.

The surroundings of the city hospital had these changes over the span of years between 2007 to 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 73 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-03-27 minhnhat2002 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'access to'.
Suggestion: access to
... two maps illustrated displays the road access to access to a city hospital at two different times,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.28497409326 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29840494832 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430051813472 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9317476002 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276324639052 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147331899134 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105011846612 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203649525085 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483119452016 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.84 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.