Two provided maps illustrate the way to reach a hospital of the area in two different years, 2007 and 2010.
Overall, changes occured in the addition of facilities such as public car park, bus station and two roundabout. By contrast, the hospital and roads as well as the staff car park remain the same after three years.
On the east side of the hospital, there was a new car park for the public which is added in the later year. Six bus stop on the sides of hospital road was removed to save the place for the new bus station on the west of the road. The new feature needed to be mentioned is the two around-turns. One of them is right opposite the hospital and the other one is at the junction of hospital road and city road. Both of them can lead the way to the bus station.
On the other hand, the city hospital did not experience any alternative and so are the arrangement of roads. The car park which used to be for both staffs and the public, in 2010, it was narrowed down its users to only the staffs of the hospital.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 96
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with t 56
- The table gives information about the number of deep mines producing coal in the UK between 1913 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavent 11
- The diagram shows the process of making recycled paper from old newspaper Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.22842639594 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27241143838 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8282097623 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.3 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179993346256 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745000625667 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651973500298 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120369151546 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624105667136 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.25 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.