The maps above illustrate the road access to City Hospital in two different years, 2007 and 2010. In general, there are several changes related to the construction of Roundabouts, Bus Station and new Car Park. In detail, there were two Roundabouts built in 2010. The first one was constructed in the intersection of City Road and Hospital, while the other intersection was set up in the three-way-intersection of Ring Road and Hospital Road. Formerly, there was no Roundabout in the way to City Hospital.
In 2007, there used to be several Bus Stops along the Hospital Road. Three years later, in 2010, those Bus Stops have been removed and as a substitution, a new Bus Station was established in the southwestern side of the map. Additionally, in 2010 there was a separation of Car Park into two different car parks, Staff Car Park and Public Car Park. The Staff Car Park was located in the old Car Park's location while the Public Car Park was constructed in the northeastern side of the map.
In conclusion, there were extensive development of road access to get into City Hospital during three years. Changes were made through the replacement of old facilities and building of new facilities.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89215686275 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04829447275 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475490196078 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5798873586 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7272727273 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18039619213 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906364338257 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967348344284 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133670059864 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647174086566 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.